CONSTITUTIONALLY SPEAKING, THERE CAN BE

NO GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE

INSURANCE MANDATE

In 1935 the Supreme Court emphatically ruled that Congress did not possess any constitutional authority to create either a voluntary or mandatory government benefits program like a National Health Care insurance mandate, or, for that matter, like the social security system, and consequently, the U.S. government cannot lawfully under the U.S. Constitution, compel any American Citizen to participate in any benefits, retirement, “insurance”, National Health Care, or welfare program. The specific language of the Court’s ruling reads:

"The catalogue of means and actions which might be imposed upon an employer in any business, tending to the satisfaction and comfort of his employees, seems endless. Provision for free medical assistance, nursing, clothing, food, housing, and education of children, and a hundred other matters might with equal propriety be proposed as tending to relieve the employee of mental strain and worry. Can it fairly be said that the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce extends to the prescription of any or all of these things? It is not apparent that they are really and essentially related solely to the social welfare of the worker, and therefore remote from any regulation of commerce as such? We think the answer is plain. These matters obviously lie outside the orbit of congressional power." Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co, 295 U.S. 330, 55 S. Ct. 758 (1935) (emphasis added)

Anything “outside the orbit of congressional power” is obviously NOT a power legitimately possessed by Congress to exercise,

NOT then, in 1935, AND NOT NOW, in 2009,

BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT SAYS THAT IT IS NOT AN

ENUMERATED POWER UNDER THE CONSTITUTION !!!

THERE CAN BE NO FEDERAL HEALTH CARE MANDATE OR TAX IN AMERICA

BECAUSE, IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!

Now let’s put an end to all the nonsense on the other side of this argument as well. These IDIOTS claiming that “interstate commerce” is the legitimate basis for this “program” AND TAX, ARE ALL BLATANTLY LYING TO YOU, and they must think we are all idiots.

First, if I refuse to buy ANY health insurance at all, where is the interstate commerce to tax? THERE IS NO COMMERCE AT ALL WHEN I REFUSE TO BUY A PRODUCT, interstate or otherwise. There is no legitimate basis for federal tax found in the interstate commerce clause when I refuse to buy a product or service, because there is no commerce at all.

Next, doesn’t federal law prohibit Americans from buying their health insurance from outside of their own state? So, in the arena of health insurance, interstate commerce DOES NOT EXIST BECAUSE CONGRESS HAS MADE IT ILLEGAL. So the next time some idiot says “interstate commerce” is the constitutional basis for the new health care law, JUST POINT THESE FACTS OUT AND TELL THEM THAT THEY ARE AN IDIOT! There is no interstate commerce to tax and the Supreme Court SAID SO!

So, if Congress increased competition and made it legal to buy health insurance across state lines, THEN they could tax THOSE PEOPLE WHO CHOSE TO DO SO, i.e.: the actual interstate commerce that did occur.

END OF STORY

END OF POWER

THE END