
![]()
·
"...by
the previous ruling (Brushaber, 240 US 1), it was
settled that the provisions of the
16th Amendment conferred no new power of
taxation but simply
prohibited the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation
possessed by Congress from the beginning from
being taken out of the category of
INDIRECT taxation to which it
inherently belonged.." Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240
You see, Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the
Constitution says:
"Representatives
and direct taxes shall be apportioned
among the several states which may be included in this union, according to
their respective numbers..."
And Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 says:
"No capitation or other direct tax shall be laid, UNLESS IN APPORTIONMENT
to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken."
Finally, The 16th Amendment DOES NOT SAY that the
income tax is to be DIRECT. It says:
"Congress
shall have power to lay and collect taxes on income from whatever source
derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to
any census or enumeration."
The 16th Amendment says that the income tax is to be without apportionment, BUT
IT DOES NOT SAY THAT THE TAX IS TO BE DIRECT.
THE JUDICIAL TREASON EXPOSED
The
judges TREASONOUSLY added that ON THEIR OWN, IN DIRECT
CONFLICT AND IN DIRECT CONTRADICTION WITH THE EXISTING PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE I
REGARDING DIRECT TAXATION.
It is Sedition & Treason to attempt to replace by
interpretation, the written provisions of Article I with something
not actually written in the 16th Amendment (or anywhere else in the
Constitution).
Any judge that attempts to replace the twice written provisions of Article I
with an interpretation of the 16th amendment that attempts to transform the
non-apportioned income tax into an allegedly direct tax commits sedition against the Constitution and treason against the nation
by not upholding the written provisions of Article I, as he or she has
sworn to do.
Article
I, section 9, clause 4 EXPLICITLY
PROHIBITS the government from doing what they are doing – i.e.- imposing
the income tax as though it were a direct tax that did not have to be
apportioned. Every
judge that alleges the 16th Amendment authorizes a direct tax, despite the fact that the amendment does not actually say
that, despite the fact that the Supreme Court
specifically rejected that reasoning, and despite the fact that Article I
provisions prohibit that interpretation, commits treason and sedition of
the highest order by ignoring and not upholding the actual written provisions
of the Constitution as they have sworn to do, and attempting to replace them
with his or her own personal (socialist communist)
interpretive opinions, not actually written in the
Constitution.
These facts are confirmed by the Congressonal Research
Service !.
Do
The Courts Have Law Making Powers ?
VIOLATION OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE
Finally, I believe
there is an even more obvious violation of the Constitution that is occurring –
or rather, being committed by the IRS and the Judiciary. The 16th Amendment states in part:
"Congress
shall have power to lay and collect taxes on income….
Under
the current tax system and IRS operation there is a clear violation of the
separation of powers clause of the Constitution. Specifically, the Constitution
establishes three separate branches of the government, the Congressional, the
Executive and the Judiciary. Each branch
is given specific powers and responsibilities within the Constitution, and NO branch may exercise the powers of the other two
branches. Briefly, Congress and the Executive cannot
conduct trials – that is reserved to the Judiciary, the Judiciary and the
Executive cannot enact Law – that is reserved to the Congress, and the Congress
and the Judiciary cannot try to run the government on a day to day basis – that
is reserved to the Executive. Now each branch
also has other specific powers given to it, but the above is a very brief
outline of the system of checks and balances created by the Founding Fathers to
try and ensure that our government would never become too heavy handed or
oppressive by exercising too much power against the citizens in an arbitrary or
capricious manner.
Now, the I.R.S. is part of the Treasury, which is a
Cabinet level position. And the
“Cabinet” is part of the Executive Branch of the government – all appointed by
the President. So, because the I.R.S.
is organized within the Treasury, it is formally a part of the Executive
Branch of the government, NOT the Congressional branch.
Now, while it may seem completely normal for the
Treasury (in the form of the I.R.S.) to collect tax (that must be deposited in
the Treasury) – the income tax is explicitly ordered to be handled
differently by the language of the authorizing (16th) Amendment, which says:
"CONGRESS shall have power to lay AND COLLECT…
Congress
must collect the income tax – not the executive branch of government !!!
Clearly, this Constitutional mandate is being
ignored – it is not being followed.
Congress lays the tax, BUT the Executive, NOT THE CONGRESS, is
collecting it – in clear violation of the specific language of the
Amendment. It is a clear and obvious
VIOLATION of the Separation of Powers clause for the IRS to try and enforce the
collection of the income tax.
The reason why this is so important is because by
allowing the Executive branch to do the dirty work (collection &
enforcement), CONGRESS escapes their ultimate responsibility for the horrors of
what the system has become. You see – we
could vote the entire Congress out of office in just two years if the American
People realized that it is Congress and Congress alone that is responsible for
the tyranny and criminality of the I.R.S.
By separating the two tasks (lay and collect) –
NO ONE BECOMES RESPONSIBLE for the intrusions, thefts and travesties being
committed by the I.R.S. Congress says –
we just pass the laws – we don’t enforce; and the Executive says – we don’t
make the law, we just enforce what we think it says. Each points the finger at the other (how
convenient) and ultimately no one in the government is held responsible or
accountable for the criminal trespasses committed against the citizens by the
“system” in the name of tax.
Passage of the 16th Amendment (income
tax) was very controversial and the intent was to frame responsibility, for
whatever system that would ultimately be enacted, all under one roof of the
government that would alone be accountable to the American People for both the
level of taxation imposed and the nature and tactics of the collection and
enforcement operations. Since Congress
makes the law – they were tasked with the ENTIRE OPERATION of the income
tax system, laying and collection – NOT JUST LAYING THE TAX. That way, it was felt, that if things got out
of hand, the People could vote the collective Congress out of office in just two years and elect new
candidates that had promised to change the (what had become over time) now
oppressive tax collection operations.
By
being allowed to un-constitutionally separate themselves from the collection
operation, Congress has been illegally allowed to escape its ultimate
responsibility (and total accountability) for the crimes being committed
against the American People in the form of the unlawful and tyrannical acts of
the I.R.S.. Meanwhile, they (Congress) spend all their time raising (taking)
money from the corporations to get re-elected, too busy to care or help the
average Citizens they are supposed to represent, who are caught in the
bureaucratic, computerized, nightmarish mis-applicatioon of the law that the
IRS calls tax collection.
And, surprise, surprise, the Judiciary does
absolutely nothing to uphold the Constitutional requirement that
Congress, NOT THE EXECUTIVE branch of the government, conduct and manage these
collection activities – ABSOLUTELY CRIMINAL !
![]()
![]()
Last Update:
Web Author: The Disciples of Truth
Copyright ©1997 by Agents of the LORD GOD R SAFE - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
![]()